Everyone’s familiar with “Rule 34 of the Internet: there is porn of any conceivable subject”.
Is there also a rule that states that fandom abhors a vacuum of sexually available slim white men to ship with each other, and any piece of media that doesn’t include at least two will invent them?
Should a piece of popular media include one (1) thin white boy, failure to include another thin white boy to ship him with will result in the most popular ships in a particular fandom…
1.) importing another thin white boy from an unrelated piece of media to pair him with, regardless of reciprocated canon relationships with female characters…
2.) interpreting a non-human character as a thin white boy, even a much, much older antagonist…
3.) shipping the thin white character with himself…
Related: if a fandom DOES include at least two thin white boys, but neither of them are lead characters, they will become the most popular ship in that fandom, preferred over non-white lead male characters who display affection towards one another….
Harry Potter and Philosophy: If Aristotle Ran Hogwarts edited by William Irwin, David Baggett, and Shawn Klein
Fic: Why Fanfiction is Taking Over the World by Anne Jamison
*Harry, a History by Melissa Anelli
*Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince by J.K. Rowling
A Storm of Swords by George R.R. Martin
The Raven King by Maggie Stiefvater
George by Alex Gino
*Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows by J.K. Rowling
Harry Potter and the Cursed Child by Jack Thorne
A Feast for Crows by George R.R. Martin
Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenides
Annabel by Kathleen Winter
Pantomime by Laura Lam
Red Dragon by Thomas Harris
The Silence of the Lambs by Thomas Harris
Daughters of Darkness: Lesbian Vampire Stories edited by Pam Keesey
Goosebumps: Welcome to Dead House by R.L. Stine
Goosebumps: Stay Out of the Basement by R.L. Stine
Goosebumps: Monster Blood by R.L. Stine
Goosebumps: Say Cheese And Die! by R.L. Stine
Hannibal by Thomas Harris
Me and Earl and the Dying Girl by Jesse Andrews
Supermutant Magic Academy by Jillian Tamaki
The Giver by Lois Lowry
Gathering Blue by Lois Lowry
Messenger by Lois Lowry
The Emperor’s Soul by Brandon Sanderson
Legion by Brandon Sanderson
A Girl Corrupted by the Internet is the Summoned Hero?! by Eliezer Yudkowsky
*Those marked with asterisks were rereads this year.
Aaah I finally succeeded at this!! I’m really glad I read so much this past year, but I think I’m going to ease off of the 50 book challenge in 2017… As 2016 went on, I got more and more stressed about completing the challenge, and reading isn’t as fun when you’re stressed about doing it. Now that the pressure is off (and now that I have a kindle!), I might end up reading just as much anyway in 2017. 🙂
I would highly recommend most of these books! For reviews of most of them, check out my youtube channel. More reviews coming soon.
are we done pretending supernatural is a good show
Excuse fucking me? Say that again bitch?
are we done pretending supernatural is a good show
We are, in fact, done pretending supernatural is a good show.
Are we done pretending that a huge ass group of people can’t still continue to love the show and think it’s still good while others don’t?
Newflash, tumblr, it’s ok to have differing opinions. If you don’t think SPN is good, fab! There’s lot of other channels and shows you can turn on.
If you still think SPN is good and enjoyable, then don’t let someone on tumblr make you feel bad for enjoying it.
“Don’t let someone make you feel bad for enjoying it.” No. That’s not how privilege works. Because privilege is central to what makes Supernatural a bad show. What Supernatural fans need to do is LET PEOPLE SAY IT’S BAD. And move on quietly, respecting that those people who are damaged by Supernatural’s irresponsible bullshit are allowed to speak up about their media being garbage.
Because there’s a difference between a show being good and enjoying a show.
Supernatural is not a good show. I love Supernatural.
See what I did?
It’s a bad fucking show. It is. It’s damaging to people of color, women, and queer people. You know how I know that? Because I listen to people of color, women, and queer people who find it damaging and have said so. And instead of defending Supernatural, I keep my mouth shut, let the people who need to speak up have a voice, and go on enjoying my show.
That’s how you enjoy problematic things.
There’s no high horse about that. I don’t feel threatened by that. I can understand that Supernatural is a shitty, damaging show that treats its female characters like garbage and has virtually zero characters of color. And I can still like it.
If you like it, fine. But if you encounter people who have a problem with it, respect that they have a problem with it—BECAUSE THEY HAVE A GOOD REASON TO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT—and that includes letting people say it’s garbage right here on Tumblr. And then scroll by and go on enjoying your show without feeling the need to defend something that actually hurts people. That’s what surrendering your privilege is all about.
The Supernatural fandom needs to learn to not be threatened. I know from more than enough experience.
Whew. Okay. Listen, I’m not gonna defend our good ole friend
peujeune up there, because the “WHAT U SAY BITCH” is a pretty classic
fandom baby response, and imma bet peujeune is like 16 and thinks s/he’s pretty
edgy for gettin on OP’s case. I’m not defending that kind of behavior.
However, I don’t think that peujeune would use that tone or
respond that way to just any criticism of Supernatural. In my experience, when
people ARE vocal about things that are problematic in the show, a majority of
fans are supportive and responsive. But OP didn’t write this post for the sake
of social justice–I sincerely doubt they were trying to address privilege,
here. To me, the tone of OP’s post is, rather, an effort to dismiss and step
away from a large contingent of the tumblr fan community. It is a status
symbol. What the OP has said is that the show is Not Good. But what people are
reading into it is this: This show is not good and you are stupid for liking it. The
people who reblog this post who are in the fandom will use it as a point of
pride because it shines like a badge of enlightenment–they are henceforth exonerated
from any ridicule of the show because they, unlike the rest of the fandom, are Smart enough to know their
show is Not Good. And for people who are not involved
with the fandom, this is ridicule. It’s a taunt, and it strikes me as very
mean-spirited, especially given the way it very purposefully makes an example
of a young fan, framing them as the idiot-mirror to a popular argument and
allowing the reader to get a good laugh at their expense. This post is not a
friendly post or a well-reasoned discussion about privilege. This post is kind
of mean, and it is made for no other reason than to make people feel bad about
themselves. What other purpose could it possibly have?
Obviously people are allowed to dislike the show. Obviously
people are allowed to think it is not a good show. And obviously tons of people
do! Even the people who do define Supernatural as a “good” show are critical of
it. The trick is to watch Supernatural with a discerning eye and a critical
mind–and that’s the trick to watching literally anything nowadays. It’s kind
of the purpose of fandom. Engage with your media and start a dialogue about
it–tumblr is an amazing forum for it. I have met so many smart, critical,
open-minded people in the Supernatural fandom. Anyone who is passively
consuming media probably isn’t on tumblr anyway, because this is the land of
rabid, active consumption where people come to be engaged in their media and
participate with a group that is, likewise, engaged in its media. So yes, I
absolutely support you when you say that people are allowed to voice their
opinions on the show and the reasons it is problematic and the ways that it
hurt them. I see that happen every day without consequence. No, what I have a
problem with is the particular brand of self-hating fandom you’re asking us to
aspire to.
This problem is endemic to tumblr–“goodness” or enjoyability
being equated with an arbitrary sense of moral rightness. Equating a show
or movie with its moral weaknesses, writing off an actor or musician
as “problematic” once they have done something that some faction of tumblr
perceives as harmful. This dialogue is RAMPANT on tumblr, and no matter how
good its intention may be, no matter how much good it might have done, no
matter how right someone might be, the language employed often reeks of
self-righteous, pedagogic propaganda. It paints the reader as privileged,
unsympathetic, harmful, weak-willed, and lacking a moral compass if they do not
feel a certain way. It backs them into a corner, creates a dichotomy, and
forces them to make a decision, much like the post above: Am I a good, smart
person like the OP? Or am I like peujeune? Do I think Supernatural is bad, or
am I an idiot? You employed that very same language above, and you did so with
such virulent authority, from such a very high moral ground, that it MUST be
true: Do I listen to women, people of color, and queer people, or do I say the
show is good? Do I think this is a bad show, or am I problematic?
See what you did?
And here’s the thing: fundamentally, I am not
disagreeing with you. Allow people to express their grievances. Respect the
beliefs of others. Acknowledge the ways in which your show might be deeply
flawed. But your method of doing so is a problem.
I don’t have to hate myself for thinking this show is good. I don’t. That’s literally all that @winjennster was saying before you
crawled up her ass, and she’s absolutely right. Essentially, you’re allowing
people to come into your church to worship your god, but you’re still telling those
heathens they’re going to hell with a smile on your face, and so help them if
they don’t keep their fuckin’ mouths shut about it.
What is “good” is more nuanced than what we
have been led to believe on tumblr. “Good” is not
objective. “Good” is not something that you alone get to decide on, and “good”
is certainly not something that you
get to define for me. This is not black and white. Something can be “good”
and problematic. Something can progress. Something can stagnate. Something can
have a great scope and a great range of quality and sensitivity. Great works of
literature and film might be racist or sexist, authors who have produced great
works might be terrible people. We just have to have to fortitude to
acknowledge those things, think about them, and consider the way that they
piece into our lives, and the way we can reconcile them with our modern
society, our personal moral code, and the rights and wrongs we abide by. And
even though I will freely allow people to express the ways in which they think
the show has failed them on their own blog, in their own sphere of influence, I
do not have to let that become my truth. As someone who is critically engaged
with the show and with the fandom, as someone who is a conscientious observer
and someone who identifies as queer in several respects, as someone who is
respectful and thoughtful, I am allowed to feel however the fuck I want about
Supernatural, and you don’t get to say fuck-all about it.
So when I see a post like this, where someone
has employed hurtful dialogue to purport a message that is in no way productive
or progressive, I am allowed to think: Fuck off. Supernatural has issues. But
Supernatural is good. Supernatural has done good. Supernatural means a great
deal to me. I appreciate and respect the strides this show has taken, the way
its actors and its characters have grown and changed.
[Fandom] takes the place of some of the functions of a church in a small town: A place where people come together, ostensibly to worship something. But really what’s happening is you’re forming a community. It’s less about what you’re worshiping and more about, “We have these interests in common.” Someone has a sick aunt and suddenly it’s about that, raising money to help her or sharing resources to make her life easier. That’s what it was about with The X-Files on the Internet.
I’ve never really seen any celebrity “get” fandom the way Duchovny did. A lot of people read that quote and, at the time, mistakenly read it as David saying he was like a god. But what he meant was that (as I believe he clarified elsewhere) fans didn’t need him to make an appearance. Fandom wasn’t about him. It was about us–the fans.
I want us to not forget that. When the fandom’s centre stops being the community of fans and becomes, instead, focused on–even blinded by–the glittering idol, then fandom itself becomes nothing more than idolatry–with all of us, as individuals, jockeying for a touch or a piece of that idol and stomping over each other to get it.
I’ve seen fandoms fall apart when that happens. I’ve seen fandoms become places where fans know and care more about the celebrities than we do about each other.
I know there are good reasons for fans to create personas and screen names. But this might be a good time to re-introduce ourselves to each other. And to think about how much more important that is than is meeting a famous person at the stage door.
And three months later… I finally put together a video of all the fun we had at LeviosaCon in Las Vegas! I had an amazing time with @angelicyourd and @dreamercomesitbymyfire, this was one of the best con experiences I have had yet.
There are annotations throughout to help you skip to the convention parts of the video, if you’d rather not hear about drinking, gambling, or our other adventures in the city. We didn’t get too wild, but still 😛
Seriously can’t wait for next year. (Also I don’t own a tripod, the vlogging parts of this video are pretty low tech. I’m old school.)
I know discourse is the word of choice in fandom nowadays but I kind of wish we would have stuck with “fandom wank” because it carries the implication that the anger involved culminated into effectively nothing and that the act was wholeheartedly masturbatory in nature rather than for any greater cause.
I saw this post about an hour after I saw a post that said, essentially, “There should be a word for that thing where [exactly describes ‘squeeing’].”
I feel like the time has come to produce something like this:
Squee: The noise you make when something is so good that all you can really do is squeak or squeal. A high pitched sound of delight, often accomanied by hugging yourself or others.
Squick: A fic/art/concept/topic that is repellent to you, so you reject association with it and instead retreat to your personal comfortable spaces- all the while remembering that someone else’s comfort is not your own.
YKINMKATO: Also called “kink tomato.” Abbreviation meaning “your kink is not my kink, and that’s okay.” Used to explain why you are rejecting art or fic brought to you by someone else. A solid mantra to recall instead of sending flames in people’s comments
Flames: The comment equivalent of anon hate.
AMV: “animated music video” or “anime music video.” Often, this is stylized to fit a specific fandom, such as a “PMV” (pony music video) in my little pony. May also be referred to as a lyricstuck.
Filk: Combination of the words “film” and “folk,” this is a music genre, to which “fan songs” and “fan parody covers” belong. If you don’t really understand what this means, take a quick listen to American Pie, then compare Weird Al Yankovic’s Saga Begins
BNF: Big name fan. You know that one person who is just so fuckign popular in your fandom? Their art is always on your dash, everyone knows their fics? Being spoken to directly by them is basically being noticed by everyone ever’s senpai? That’s what these people are called.
DL:DR; Not unliked the teal deer (tl;dr, or “too long, didn’t read”), DLDR means “don’t like? Don’t read!” It’s a reminder that you are under no obligation, ever, to expose yourself to uncomfortable (or, squicky), or potentially harmful (or, triggering), material. Not ever. If you don’t actively like something? It’s not worth your time. Skip it.
Gen: or “genfic” “genart” etc. Fan works which contain no or very little romantic content. Often these are styled after the canon material, and may be called “episodic” ro “slice of life” in addition.
Lemon: Work containing strong pornographic elements
Lime, or Citrus: Work containing mild or implicit pornographic elements
Sockpuppeting: The surprisingly common scenario of someone making a bunch of fake accounts/sideblogs to send themselves reviews or hate, to try to increase views or drama surrounding a work. The accounts they make are called Sockpuppets.
WAFF: Warm and fluffy feelings. A genre of fic that exists just to be therapeutically sweet. Nowadays, usually just called “fluffy.”
Schmoop: Take WAFF and somehow make it even more syrupy. You’ll know it when you see it.
Whump: Imagine if you will, a hurt-comfort fic. The comfort might be considered WAFF. The hurt? That’s the whump.
Wapanese: When white autors pepper their anime fanfic with random, tonally inappropriate japanese words.
Anthropomorfic: Nowadays we just call these “humanstuck” or “humanized AU.”
Wank: Wildly disproportionate drama that crops up because someone wrote/drew/did something that someone else didn’t like. Seriously, I cannot begin to express the fiascos that have come about from all this. Just… Just go look at this.
Plot bunny: Story ideas that you probably won’t ever actually deal with, but that multiply entirely out of control, creating huge worlds in your head that you’re probably not going to write. But hey! You might! And until then they make great sideblogs/askblogs/tumblr posts.
Casefic: Fanfics that try to create an episode-like feel for procedural and crime dramas, moster of the week shows, etc.
Jossed: When popular fan theories and fanon are addressed in the canon of a series, and whoops, turns out we were all very, very wrong.
Kripked: When popular fan theories and fanon are addressed in the canon of a show and, hot damn, we fucking called it.
Secret Masters: The people who run the websites/ communities/etc that we all do our fanning on. Less relevant now that we have things like tumblr, but when everyone had to run their own archival and social sites for each fandom, it was more important to pay our respects to the strange and powerful beings that brought us all together and gave us our fannish homes. Think the staff of AO3, for example.
Bashing: When a writer purposefully writes a specific character as a horrible, horrible person so that they can throw them out of the storyline, usually to allow their OTP to get together without trouble. Distinct from fridging in that it doesn’t require the character to die, but rather to be such a screaming harpy that they get rightfully removed from the main characters’ lives for being an abusive hell beast. Generally, a type of character hate. Be wary of people who bash women, queer people, and POC with consistency: they are not safe to be around.
‘Squick’ also has an alternate horrible meaning for Harry Potter fans who were in fandom a while back. Dear god.
Drabble: A fic that is EXACTLY 100 words. Often used as a creative exercise in telling a story in a very small constraint.
Ficlet: Fic that clocks in somewhere between 100 to 2.5K words.
Crossover: A piece of media in which two or more source materials are treated as the same universe. Characters from Fandom A can meet characters from Fandom B. (The Doctor Goes To Hogwarts And Meet Harry Potter!)
Fusion: A fusion takes the characters of one source material and *surplants* them into another universe entirely. Characters from Fandom A cannot meet characters from Fandom B. (Dave Strider is part of an Inception team!)
TPTB: The Powers That Be. Almost always redundantly referred to as “the TPTB.” A collective term for showrunners, actors, producers, writers, et al, anyone who is part of the team that creates the source material.
YMMV: Your Mileage May Vary. A shorthand way of saying “this is how I see it/have experienced it though I realize others might have a different perspective.”
Tinhatting: Often used in RPF fandoms, the situation where some fans are convinced two celebrities are in a relationship but its being kept a secret.
New book reviews video is up! 20 book reviews – I had some hardcore catching up to do.
The Books: The Raven Cycle (4) – Maggie Stiefvater The Autistic Brain – Temple Grandin The Casual Vacancy – J.K. Rowling George – Alex Gino Lyddie – Katherine Paterson Flora & Ulysses: The Illuminated Adventures – Kate DiCamillo Fortunately, The Milk – Neil Gaiman A Song of Ice and Fire (4) – George R.R. Martin A Hero at the End of the World – Erin Claiborne Harry, A History – Melissa Anelli Harry Potter & Philosophy: If Aristotle Ran Hogwarts – edited by David Baggett, Shawn E. Klein, and William Irwin Fic: Why Fanfiction Is Taking Over the World – Anne Jamison Harry Potter and the Cursed Child (Parts 1 and 2) – Jack Thorne
You can ship characters for happily ever afters, sure, you can ship them for tragically-then-happily, you can ship two or three or four or more, you can ship endless combinations of personality types and relationship dynamics
but you can also ship characters under very specific circumstances, or for a certain period of their life but not for all of it, or only in a certain universe. You might say “I ship these characters” and what you mean is you think they are fascinating together and could have a story together. That story could be any kind of story.
Sometimes it means you want them together for the rest of their lives. Sometimes it means something different than that.
I don’t know about you, but for me, “I ship it” means “There is a story in this ship and I am interested in that story.”
for me, “I ship it” means “There is a story in this ship and I am interested in that story.”